Saturday, January 28, 2012

Remember this Date



THERE ARE NONE SO BLIND AS THOSE WHO REFUSE TO SEE!!!

Do you remember January 3, 2007??


  This is just a History lesson.  I am sending it to all regardless of party .

The day the Democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009, it was actually January 2nd 2007, the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, at the very start of the 110th Congress.

The Democratic Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.

For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this:
January 3rd, 2007, the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress:
The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%
The Unemployment rate was 4.6%
George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION!
Remember that day...
January 3rd, 2007 was the day that
Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.
The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?
BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!
THANK YOU DEMOCRATS (especially Barney ) for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP and 4.6% Unemployment...to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES!
(BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie -starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy). Barney blocked it and called it a "Chicken Little Philosophy" (and the sky did fall!)
And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? - OBAMA
And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie? - OBAMA and the Democrat Congress, especially
BARNEY!!!!

So when someone tries to blame Bush...
REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007.... THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!"
Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the gas pedal and steering wheel, while they were driving the economy into the ditch.

Budgets do not come from the White House.. They come from Congress, and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democratic Party.  Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 & 2011.
In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush, though belatedly, got tough on spending increases.

For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government  running and to increase government spending until Barack Obama could take office.  At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budget.

And where was Barack Obama during this time?  He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009.  Let's remember what the deficits looked like during that period:
If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets.  That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending.  After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.

If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.
In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is "I inherited a deficit that I voted for, and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th."
There is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!

 "The problems we face today exist because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living."

Thursday, January 26, 2012

SHAME ON YOU - OPEN Letter


Open Letter on Debt

SHAME ON YOU
Shame on all 535 members of Congress.
I know that Republicans do NOT have a 2/3 majority in either House.
But I say SHAME on ALL; Republicans and Democrats.

IF you failed to vote AGAINST more DEBT, then SHAME ON YOU.
But, I have a plan for you….

I want YOU , who believe in more DEBT, to put your personal finances in the same state as you voted for America.
 What does this mean? This is what it means…..
YOU have to take all your income, and cash, and donate it to DEBT REDUCTION…..
 Not only that, ….. I want you to BORROW 43+c of every $$ you have/own to
 MORE DEBT REDUCTION…… until your ASSETS are depleted beyond all hope.
Then you SHAMEFUL examples of stupidity might finally realize what you stand for.


IF YOU voted against more DEBT, I should be able to hear you with my own defective ears, without need of TV or the Internet.
Where are you?
WHY are you NOT flooding every TV channel with your rage?
Are you a wussie?... Are you more concerned about “image”
WHAT is it?
Where are YOU?
STAND UP FOR AMERICA………….. or take a hike.. QUIT…RESIGN….

He BLEW the Judge away


Obama Eligibility
From my Facebook post
Well, Jan 26 is near.... and I repeat
those with nothing to hide, hide nothing.

Stay tuned.............

Let me know if you come upon anything..................

http://www.exposeobama.com/2012/01/22/video-obama-summoned-to-appear-in-georgia-court/

There is , according to camp obama, NO RIGHT TIME
TOO early…too early…too early …oops … TOO LATE
In fact, a presidential elector in California brought a lawsuit challenging Obama’s eligibility at the time of the 2008 election and was told the dispute was not yet ripe because the inauguration hadn’t taken place. The courts later ruled that the elector lost his “standing” to bring the lawsuit after the inauguration.

Can’t wait for Jan 26.

Well TODAY is Jan 26.
Obama and his lawyer were NO SHOW
============
Today there was a hearing in a GA court. Neither Obama nor his lawyer was there.
If you or I spit in the eye of a judge, we would be slammed with contempt of court and sent to jail... we have to wait to see if it is Citizen Obama or King Obama.

============

What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence, because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will be allowed on the Georgia ballot.

===========

For fascinating reading,

http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138

=====================
The ALL important result is the immediate decision by the Judge… of course leading to appeals, etc, either way.

Regardless, this is a 1st !

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

The Strange Case of Gibson Guitars


Gibson Guitars

This is a strange case. It seems that the US Dept. of Justice (DOJ) is accusing Gibson of breaking the law in some other Country (Madagascar & India). Since when does the US DOJ act as an International agent; especially when Gibson says they have letters from each Country stating no laws were broken.

What’s going on?

Long before the recent NDAA was passed, federal agents with guns and bullet proof vests broke into Gibson Guitars. As reported by the CEO, no charges have been filed (I think he means criminal charges), but DOJ is suing Gibson at great cost to Gibson. THAT is Obama power!
The CEO reports that DOJ is suing an American Co to protect a foreign Country law; one that protects jobs overseas. What happened to JOBS for America?

Or, is this just another Obama anti-colonial tantrum?

The lawsuit is costing Gibson plenty in legal fees. These will ultimately result in higher consumer prices or loss of jobs at Gibson, or both. It might even drive Gibson to move where they have economic freedom.
Ironically, just recently, Obama virtually shouted at his jobs conference that America needs no more regulations than needed for the health, safety, and security of American people.

But this seems NOT about American law or regulations. It seems to be about Global Potentate Obama.

Can you help me? Can you explain it?

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Voter ID - What's the Deal

What’s behind the hullabloo on Voter ID?
Is there ANY sensible, reasonable, argument against it?
ID is such a common thing/requirement that arguing against it seems inconceivable.
It won’t help to list ALL or even many places that ID is required today.
I smell something nefarious.
What could it be?
Our president (?)  said ………(8/21/10)
“The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.”
Truer words were never spoken.
So, ASSUMING voters have nothing to hide, they could not object.
Unless there was some other nasty impediment… like trying to stop them from voting!
Let’s look at that.
There are several arguments AGAINST ID…. Which “obviously” has ONLY one goal…. To deny voters their rights.
THAT is pure unadulterated cow methane…………..
The argument AGAINST ID is that it is too difficult to get.
THAT is pure unadulterated cow methane…………..
There are so many places that ID is “standard”…. Bank, plan, Rx, Car, Gun, etc.
I maintain there are few reasons for not getting ID…
·         Lazy
·         Something to Hide.
·         Too dumb
In either case, they should not vote.
It is also argued that vote fraud is almost non-existent… only a small fraction of a percent.
Who would miss them?
WHY grant such a small fraction of a percent of voters special privileges?
IF someone wants to commit voter fraud, why would they expose themselves to such a vulnerability; especially when a (fake) ID is so easy to obtain.  There is a very famous case rampant in America today and it has caused lots of grief!
I maintain that the argument is grounded in
·         A desire to garner extra votes… from illegal or dumb.
o   Illegal or dumb voters do not advance America
·         A desire to divide America; to create class warfare.
The REAL problem with NO ID is that it opens the floodgates to voter fraud.
Without Id there is no verification.
There is no way to stem fraud before it happens
…. and, as we have so sadly seen, fixing it later is almost impossible !

So, just ZIP it…..
GO WITH VOTER ID!
What do you think?


VOTER ID IN SC   Follow UP


According to South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, the State Election Commission reported 239,000 people were registered to vote without photo ID. 
Through an audit by the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles it was discovered 37,000 on the list were deceased and 96,000 had moved to other states.

But Holder sues anyway…


So, what's more important?
Voter ID or Secure our borders.... or...
DUMP Holder?

Monday, January 16, 2012

Wealth Creation


Wealth Creation …. Public or Private
It is often argued that
…The government does not create wealth; private citizens create wealth.
What’s behind that? Who is right?
We have to start by asking ….What is wealth Creation?

Any ideas?